In the Latest News from India, a dramatic event unfolded on October 7: a lawyer tried to throw a shoe at the Chief Justice of India (CJI). This took place because of remarks the judge made about a Hindu idol in a petition. This incident has become part of the Daily news highlights, and people are talking about it all over social media and news portals.
Ajeet Bharti is now in the spotlight. He is a right-wing YouTuber and social media influencer. Bharti, who calls himself a media personality, is accused of abusing CJI B. R. Gavai in a video and encouraging people to attack him, apparently over “Hindu pride.” The video clips went viral, and many users shared them widely.
Reaction from Bharti and Social Media
- After the shoe-throwing attempt, Bharti posted a video of his own on X (formerly Twitter) and other platforms. In it, he mocked the CJI and laughed about the incident.
- He said, “I wanted to make a video about ‘shoes and the Chief Justice’ after seeing his shoes in a photo recently … but I couldn’t shoot it. Looks like ‘shoes’ have been sticking to him ever since.” He also made remarks about the CJI’s Dalit-Ambedkarite background.
- Meanwhile, rumors spread that Bharti had been questioned or arrested. But Noida ADCP Sumit Shukla denied those claims. There was no confirmation of any arrest.
Bharti is not new to controversy. In past months, he made headlines for comments about Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and other issues.
What the Attacker Said
The lawyer who tried to throw a shoe is Rakesh Kishore, aged 71. He shouted a slogan:
“Sanatan dharma ka apmaan, nahi sahega Hindustan”
(“India will not tolerate insult to Sanatan Dharma or Hinduism.”)
He said he was deeply hurt by remarks the CJI had made in an earlier hearing about a religious case. The Bar Council of India immediately suspended Kishore’s license. After about three hours of questioning, the police released him—because the Supreme Court office did not file charges. His shoe and documents were also returned.
This is now part of the Daily news highlights circulating in news portals and trending stories across social media.
What the CJI Had Said in the Idol Case
To understand why this all got so heated, here’s what happened in the original case:
- On September 16, CJI Gavai rejected a petition demanding that an idol of Lord Vishnu be restored in a temple complex in Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh.
- The CJI said this is an archaeological site, so the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) must give permission
- In a sharp turn, he told the petitioners:
“Go and ask the deity itself to do something now. You say you are a staunch devotee … So go and pray now.” - Many people on social media were angry. A few days later, he clarified in open court that he did not intend disrespect:
“I respect all religions … This happened on social media,” he said.
Even after the shoe incident, the CJI did not overreact. He continued the court proceedings once the angry lawyer was taken away.
High-Profile Responses from PM & Sonia Gandhi
This act of violence triggered reactions from top leaders, making it Breaking News across India.
- Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned the attack in a post:
“There is no place for such reprehensible acts in our society. It is utterly condemnable. I appreciated the calm displayed by Justice Gavai in the face of such a situation.” - Sonia Gandhi, senior Congress leader, said:
“No words are adequate to condemn the attack on the Honourable Chief Justice of India in the Supreme Court itself. It is an assault not just on him but on our Constitution as well. The nation must stand in solidarity with him.”
Because of these statements, the event remained on front pages and continued in Latest News coverage on news portals and social media.
Why This Matters & What to Watch
The shoe-throwing incident is more than a spectacle. It raises questions about:
- Respect for institutions – Attacking a Chief Justice is a direct challenge to the judiciary.
- Freedom of speech vs hate speech – Where is the line between strong opinions and incitement to violence?
- Social media power – Videos go viral instantly and influence public opinion.
- Legal consequences – Suspending a lawyer’s license and whether criminal action will be taken.
Because of how viral video, social media, and news portals amplify events, this case is likely to be referenced in future debates about law, media, and accountability.
